Let be an interval. Let be a collection of measurable functions such that
Then there exists a constant , which depends only on the length of , but not on , such that
Proof.
In this proof denotes a positive constant which depends on the length of , but not on .
The hypothesis implies that . Moreover, since , we have
We claim that for each there is a constant such that
By contradiction, suppose that does not hold true. Then for some . By Morrey’s inequality, we have . Accordingly, for we have
for all . Thus
This yields a contradiction.
We now claim that the constant in can be take to be the same for all .
Assume by contradiction that . Then there exists a sequence in and a sequence in such that
Then (since is compact). The sequence converges weakly to some limit in . By the Rellich-Kondrachov theorem, is compactly embedded in , thus the sequence converges uniformly. By Fatou’s lemma,
Thus, and hence . Since the convergence of to is uniform, we have , which contradicts .
Remark Note carefully that continuity of alone without the integrability of would not suffice to guarantee .
This proof is an adaptation from Theorem 2.5.3 of the book:
which in turn derives from a result first proved in the following paper
This result provide conditions for having a positive uniform lower bound on the determinant of a family of minimizers from linear elastostatics for a non-simple hyperelastic material.