Proposition

Let be an interval. Let be a collection of measurable functions such that

Then there exists a constant , which depends only on the length of , but not on , such that

Proof.

In this proof denotes a positive constant which depends on the length of , but not on .

The hypothesis implies that . Moreover, since , we have

We claim that for each there is a constant such that

By contradiction, suppose that does not hold true. Then for some . By Morrey’s inequality, we have . Accordingly, for we have

for all . Thus

This yields a contradiction.

We now claim that the constant in can be take to be the same for all .

Assume by contradiction that . Then there exists a sequence in and a sequence in such that

Then (since is compact). The sequence converges weakly to some limit in . By the Rellich-Kondrachov theorem, is compactly embedded in , thus the sequence converges uniformly. By Fatou’s lemma,

Thus, and hence . Since the convergence of to is uniform, we have , which contradicts .

 

Remark Note carefully that continuity of alone without the integrability of would not suffice to guarantee .

References

This proof is an adaptation from Theorem 2.5.3 of the book:

which in turn derives from a result first proved in the following paper

This result provide conditions for having a positive uniform lower bound on the determinant of a family of minimizers from linear elastostatics for a non-simple hyperelastic material.