Consider the equation where and .
Singular points. A singular point is is one for which the hypotheses of the implicit function theorem do not hold. For any such point, we have both and .
Two examples of singular points are bifurcation points and isolated singular points.
An example of bifurcation point. Consider for example . Then the set is a solution. For each point of this set . This set contains a singular point at , where vanishes. At this point, the set intersects the solution set of the equation . In general, a bifurcation point is a point where two regular solution curves meet on the plane.
An example of isolated singular point. Consider the function . The set is a solution, and the point is a singular point on this set. However, there is no other point satisfying outside this set, since the coordinate of such point should satisfy , with . It is interesting to notice that a small perturbation unfolds the singularity, and produces two bifurcation points on the solution set , joined by circular arches.
The two previous example show that, in general, the condition is not sufficient for a point to be singular.
Transversality condition. Suppose that we have a smooth curve of solutions . We can always redefind in such a way that be a constant. Thus, without loss of generality we can assume . This property implies that the function admits the factorization
To obtain this factorization, we write . Next, suppose that . Then, by the implicit function theorem, there exists a function such that and such that for all in a neighborhood of . This function is unique. Thus, the point there exists locally one smooth a curve of solutions of the equation passing through the point . Now, it follows from that
Hence in order for to be a bifurcation point it is necessary that the following transversality condition holds true:
Disclaimer: I wrote these notes for my personal use. Most ideas have been drawn from a series of handouts which Tim Healey had gently passed to me.