Consider the boundary-value problem of nonlinear elastostatics:

div⁑𝐒+𝐛=0𝐒=Οˆβ€²β’(𝐅),𝐅=βˆ‡β‘π²,  }Β in ℬ (P)
𝐲=𝐲0,Β onΒ β’βˆ‚c⁑ℬ𝐒𝐧=𝐬0  onΒ β’βˆ‚f⁑ℬ.

We suppose that the domain ℬ undergoes a perturbation ℬ→ℬΡ, where Ξ΅ is a small parameter, and we consider the perturbed problem

div⁑𝐒Ρ+𝐛Ρ=0𝐒Ρ=Οˆβ€²β’(𝐅Ρ),𝐅Ρ=βˆ‡β‘π²Ξ΅,  }Β in ℬΡ (P)Ξ΅
𝐲Ρ=𝐲0,Ξ΅,onΒ β’βˆ‚c⁑ℬΡ𝐒Ρ⁒𝐧=𝐬Ρ onΒ β’βˆ‚f⁑ℬΡ.

Given any Ξ΅-dependent field ϕΡ on ℬΡ, and a point xβˆˆβ„¬, we define the increment of ϕΡ⁒(x) as11 1 This quantity is well defined since ℬ is an open set.

δ⁒ϕ⁒(x)=βˆ‚βˆ‚β‘Ξ΅|Ξ΅=0⁒ϕΡ⁒(x). (1)

We are going to show that the increments are solution of the following BPV:

div⁑δ⁒𝐒+δ⁒𝐛=0δ⁒𝐒=Οˆβ€²β€²β’(𝐅)⁒[δ⁒𝐅],δ⁒𝐅=βˆ‡β‘Ξ΄β’π²,  }Β in ℬ (P)Ξ΅
δ⁒𝐲+𝐅⁒δ⁒𝝋=δ⁒𝐲0,onΒ β’βˆ‚c⁑ℬδ⁒𝐒𝐧+βˆ‡β‘π’β’[δ⁒𝝋]⁒𝐧+𝐒⁒δ⁒𝐧=δ⁒𝐬0 onΒ β’βˆ‚f⁑ℬ.

For simplicity, we prove this result in the case when 𝐬0 vanishes.

As a start, we choose an arbitrary test function 𝐯 defined on ℬ such that 𝐯=0 on βˆ‚c⁑ℬ. Then, we let 𝐯Ρ be the unique test function on ℬΡ such that 𝐯Ρ⁒(φΡ⁒(x))=𝐯⁒(x). Then,

βˆ«β„¬Ξ΅π’Ξ΅β‹…βˆ‡β‘π―Ξ΅=βˆ«β„¬Ξ΅π›Ξ΅β‹…π―Ξ΅. (2)

As done in the one-dimensional case, we change the domain of integration by considering a diffeomorphism 𝝋Ρ:ℬ→ℬΡ, and by defining the functions

𝐒~Ρ⁒(x)=𝐒Ρ⁒(𝝋Ρ⁒(x)),𝐛~Ρ⁒(x)=𝐛Ρ⁒(𝝋Ρ⁒(x)), (3)

we obtain

βˆ«β„¬π’~Ρ⁒(Cofβ’βˆ‡β‘π‹Ξ΅)β‹…βˆ‡β‘π―=βˆ«β„¬(detβ‘βˆ‡β‘π‹Ξ΅)⁒𝐛~Ξ΅β‹…π―β€ƒβ€ƒβˆ€π―=0⁒ onΒ β’βˆ‚c⁑ℬ. (4)

It is important to keep in mindi that 𝝋Ρ is not defined uniquely. What matters is that it maps ℬ into ℬΡ.

We differentiate with respect to Ξ΅ at Ξ΅=0, and use the relation

δ⁒𝐒~=δ⁒𝐒+βˆ‡β‘π’β’[δ⁒𝝋], (5)

as well as the analogous relation of δ⁒𝐛 to obtain

βˆ«β„¬Ξ΄β’π’β‹…βˆ‡β‘π’—+βˆ‡β‘π’β’[δ⁒𝝋]β‹…βˆ‡β‘π―+𝐒⁒δ⁒(Cofβ’βˆ‡β‘π‹)β‹…βˆ‡β‘π―=βˆ«β„¬Ξ΄β’π›β‹…π―+(βˆ‡β‘π›β’Ξ΄β’π‹)⋅𝐯+𝐛⋅(δ⁒(detβ‘βˆ‡β‘π‹)⁒𝐯). (6)

Now we can essentially repeat what has been done in the the one-dimensional case. Using integration by parts and the identity div⁑δ⁒(Cofβ’βˆ‡β‘π‹)=𝟎, we obtain

βˆ«β„¬[δ⁒𝐒+βˆ‡β‘π’β’[δ⁒𝝋]+𝐒⁒δ⁒(Cofβ’βˆ‡β‘π‹)]β‹…βˆ‡β‘π―=-βˆ«β„¬(div⁑δ⁒𝐒+(βˆ‡β‘div⁑𝐒)⁒δ⁒𝝋)⋅𝐯+div⁑𝐒⋅(δ⁒(detβ‘βˆ‡β‘π‹)⁒𝐯)+βˆ«βˆ‚β‘β„¬[δ⁒𝐒+βˆ‡β‘π’β’[δ⁒𝝋]+𝐒⁒δ⁒(Cofβ’βˆ‡β‘π‹)]⁒𝐧⋅𝐯. (7)

We substitute (7) into (6). Then we observe that thanks to the equilibrium equation div⁑𝐒+𝐛=𝟎, several terms cancel out, and the final result is

βˆ«β„¬(div⁑δ⁒𝐒+δ⁒𝐛)⋅𝐯+βˆ«βˆ‚β‘β„¬[δ⁒𝐒+βˆ‡β‘π’β’[δ⁒𝝋]+𝐒⁒δ⁒(Cofβ’βˆ‡β‘π‹)]⁒𝐧⋅𝐯=0. (8)

…